What subwoofer crossover point are you using in your receiver for the MB42x? The RB42 is pulling shenanigans up there in the upper ranges. Chemical Brothers - “Come With Us” iTunes - YouTube - Spotify. They don't do that and may initially sound "boring." The xover is the main difference! The Micca MB42 is one of the most purchased bookshelf speakers up to date. The steel guitar in California by Joni Mitchell just sounded amazing. As expected, the C-Notes are in a whole other league in terms of detail and refinement. Welcome to the goddamn loony bin. Is this accurate? Random objects added for scale. Complexity, beauty, and a rousing crescendo with near-sadistic dynamic peaks. It seems like they have kept the Micca sound signature of the hot tweeter. Any other comparisons? Cast is better than stamped, but given that this is only a 4” driver that's probably not a sin. Very impressive. Sorry to hear about this. I’ve been looking at Fluance Ai40s for a bedroom TV/music 2.0 setup. If you want to buy a speaker that will last you for a while, and you won’t ever need to add a subwoofer or get something bigger/smaller or whatever, the RB42 … I’ve provided streaming links in the comments below for your listening pleasure. Did you take any dispersion measurements? With a better/smoother tweeter, it'd be a different story, but that catapaults us right out of this price range haha. Those little woofers really push some air. Micca RB42 Reference Bookshelf Speaker with 4-Inch Woofer and Silk Tweeter (Dark Walnut, Pair) 4.8 out of 5 stars 375. They're on a VERY messy desk right now, so I don't want to post pictures. That’s not good, so measurements continued without them. Frames are stamped rather than cast. ... Micca RB42 4-Inch Bookshelf Speaker (Pair) I tried them with three different amps just to make sure it wasn't a picky amp issue, which is wasn't. We did listening impressions before measurements so the cold hard facts wouldn’t influence our tender minds. In a living room setup, the rising treble of the RB42s is not as big a problem as the measurements might imply. Replacing an aging Logitech Z-5500 system. Here's a review from NoAudiophile that backs up the "desktop reflection" issue with some measurements... and he's doing that with speakers that already angle up on their own. ft den (approx 1,700 cu. There is nearly 5dB difference between the midrange and the treble. I was mad that I didn't have a banana handy, but not quite angry enough to drive to the store and buy one! Mine is still in active use. Powered by an Emotiva A-100. Stravinsky - “Firebird Suite: Finale” (Performed by Eiji Oue & Minnesota Orchestra) iTunes - YouTube. With curiously robust bass output and silky smooth sound signature, it renders all musical genres with faithful authority along with a dose of fun. This subreddit is for the budget minded audiophile that wants to grow out of soundbars, boomboxes, portable bluetooth and lifestyle speakers, and PC branded audio solutions. Oh, nitpick: I can't see dropbox links at work, had to go mobile to see 'em. DSP-enabled “Micca Voltron” frankenstein setup, Micca RB42 ($149 MSRP, $129 introductory pricing), Externally, this speaker is as nice as anything you’ll find anywhere unless you move up a few price brackets and start getting into lacquer finishes and such, These are very compact speakers, dwarfed by competition like the Pioneer BS22. It's still a small bookshelf speaker with good build quality and a long-throw little bass element. After that, I slapped some rubber feet onto the RB42s to lightly decouple them from the surface of the desk. u/Miccatron was kind enough to send me these speakers because they love budget audiophiles and these speakers, if they perform, will be right up u/BudgetAudiophile’s alley. I think you're spot on when you say they fill a particular niche. In a subwoofer system with a proper crossover, these could be crossed over at 60hz or possibly even a little lower instead of the standard 80hz which I think has big benefits! Isolated, breathy female vocals and strong, simple synth bassline. However, Micca has done something really special here at this size and price. I thought vocals in music were plenty clear. Logitechs typically add a bunch of extra treble for "detail. I see that you might prefer these over the OS...more details needed on this. I know that was something with the MB's that bothered some. The only bad audio system, is the one you don't enjoy to the fullest. Thank you! The RB42s perform like ultimate tiny badasses for rock and hiphop. Oh, also, you didn't mention how it compared to the C-Notes, except for the "blanket" remark. All the best products. The RB42-Cs are tuned for vocals and dialog, while the RB42's are tuned for maximum bass from a tiny speaker, so if you want thumping bass from a tiny speaker, get the RB42, not the RB42-C. Fortunately, those were done before I did measurements. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the BudgetAudiophile community. The Miccas are impressive performers throughout this whole musical range thanks to more strong crossover work. The RB42 will probably still sound better in the crossover region, have less port chuffing, and so on. Joe N Tell 43,022 views. Frankly to my ears the RB42s destroy the Pioneers. In a larger room these may not be loud enough to satisfy if you're looking for party volumes. Micca tech support is great. That's an interesting experiment! Micca RB42 Has anyone had a chance to hear these speakers? You're going to love it here. They will handily outperform soundbars in this price range so perhaps they'd still be worth a look if you're extremely tight on space. A layered wall of noise from the far future. Too much. With robust bass and midrange output and a silky smooth sound signature, it renders movie dialogue and music with clarity and authority. Whatever you do, do not place these speakers directly on a desk or shelf surface. Acoustic guitar and legit contender for greatest male vocal rock performance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/1qd27gqjg7p2m10/off-axis.png?dl=0. Flared port to minimize port chuffing. Could the issue be maybe speaker wasn't raised off surface or simply a current limitation of the rb42 at the moment? The RB42 are more accurate and more betterer though, would be my short review there. They do go low but the mids were muddy and lacking. I know that was something with the MB's that bothered some. I see that you might prefer these over the OS...more details needed on this. My use case is on a desk, attached to a Windows PC, for music and gaming. What I was trying to accomplish however was to transition the Q100's elsewhere and replace them with the RB's. I got them in my mb42x-c and they sound far more incredible than stock micca speakers. They have a pretty low sensitivity, and I didn't know if that would cause any issues in a living room setup. Here were my primary test tracks. Not that you should be spending much time listening to anything at 85dB. While its -3dB point is similar to that of the BS22, the similarities end there. Thrown in to a micca enclosure. That's a good question. However, the OS have much clearer bass and still get down to the 40hz range in-room. The RB42 are a little more compact and put out fatter bass. Can reveal port chuffing if present; the spare mix means there’s nowhere for it to hide. If somebody didn't need or want the supercompact size of the RB42s, or was committed to that havin' a subwoofer lyfe, I'd say the RB42s' unique strengths would be sort of nullified. Top-quality binding terminals. The chorus is spine-tingling on good speakers. Thanks for contributing! During complex techno or classical tracks, the BS22 stay composed and are more revealing. Depends on the recording, but some classical music contains a massive dynamic range that provides the ultimate test of one’s system. I’ve seen measurements of the MK402 and they are a lot different from the RB42 despite the shares woofer. In the living room, any class AB amp will be fine and higher-powered chip amps probably will as well. Need to look into how to do summed measurements so I can give a more complete picture with my reviews. Yeah, it's not even close. Nobody here gets paid for this shit so appreciation means everything to me =). All that tells us is that Micca put a lot of effort and expense into shaping the sound of these drivers. In an alternate world, this song would be considered rock and roll royalty. The Micca RB42-C is a handsomely styled center channel speaker that delivers a level of performance that belies its affordable price. But still. In a desktop setup, a "50W" Class D amp like an SMSL Q5 Pro or SA-50 will just barely cut it. outperform the BS22's bass extension by that much, that's very impressive. We’re hearing lots of treble here. Percussion does not sound amazing. More bass and more refinement in a very small package makes a very appealing product. We're re-doing these measurements. Glad you're enjoying them though. Acoustic stuff sounds great too. I'll add that to the list of things to look at if/when I do a follow up in the next week or so. Nothing is. Solid, attractive magnetic grill covers with strong and satisfying group. They did well with heavy bass tracks, movies and music but the highs were less defined. RB42 are popular for going without a subwoofer. Micca MB42 Bookshelf Speakers – An Affordable, Quality Set of Entry-Level Speakers for Those Who Are On a Budget. I have some MB42Xs arriving today so hopefully I can spend some time with them head to head. This is a review and detailed measurements of the Micca RB42 bookshelf/desktop computer speaker. Micca is proud to be the sponsor of the "Intro to Audio" room at T.H.E. Micca RB42 $150 on Amazon Best Setting Bass 0 or +1 Treble +3, 4. I wasn't put off by it but certainly like to put down the treble a touch if I could. Neil Young - “Old Man (Live at Massey Hall)” iTunes - YouTube - Spotify. Bass output is remarkable for a speaker of this size. You certainly won't get bass that comes anywhere near that with some small little bookshelves. These are very compact speakers, dwarfed by competition like the Pioneer BS22. That’s thicker stuff than we’d normally see on much larger, more expensive speakers. You won’t be listening directly on-axis, and your normal everyday living room furnishings will absorb and scatter much of that excess high-frequency energy. Few things I didn't get to in this review. We focus on education, discussion, and sharing of entry and mid level separate & multi component audio systems. Are the RB42 worth the extra dough? I would not be opposed to buying a variety pack and doing some trial+error+measurements. If you are using these in a living room setup, I would not use anything less than a high-power Class D amp like the SMSL SA-98 or Topping PA3. The tweeters appear to be, uh, tweeters. Update: Hey, good news. If the RB42s enable a lower crossover point than the MB42X that's potentially a big benefit. This particular recording fits the bill. They are inefficient, but due to Hoffman's Iron Law that will be the case for any speaker that attempts decent bass output in a form factor this small. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, Bookshelf speakers don't go on a bookshelf. Typically you would never see a crossover half this complex in the commercial speaker world; only from DIY fanatics. These are the Micca RB42 bookshelf speakers, bought on Amazon for $150. They're only a few dB less efficient than other popular bookshelf speakers that produce some semblance of bass. Of course, an entire Radio Shack’s worth of crossover elements is not a guarantee of quality. Externally, this speaker is as nice as anything you’ll find anywhere unless you move up a few price brackets and start getting into lacquer finishes and such. God help me, I might like these better than the Overnight Sensations. Looks like the Dayton's are a much more accessible while not being much worse after I run DSP. Let’s talk about the crossovers. Outdoor measurements ← Link temporarily removed. The face is narrow and the speakers themselves … Yeah, I get why they do it... the non-audiophile public would call them "boring" without it, I'm sure. This tweeter is… just okay. I'll try and answer that in a followup post. The Miccas even manage to hang within a few decibels of the massive Classix II DIY bookshelves. With a … My take is that outside of the pro and audiophile markets most people are actively looking for boosted treble (and bass) even on the desktop. Yeah I think I'm going to have to do a follow-up putting them against the MB42X and OS! $149.99. Outdoor Measurements: Smooth... Until They’re Not? That's a good question. Here’s a whole thread of cheap and not-so-cheap ideas for doing that. Like we talked about elsewhere, any amp will be able to power these for desktop use. I really want to hear these speakers but I don't need them or even have a place to stick them...but they look great. Throw your head into this buzzsaw of raging treble and you'll enjoy the experience if your tweeters are up to it. In the meantime, listening impressions and the overall conclusion still stand. Passive Systems can *always* be upgraded! I hope this is 10% as good as one of his. Thanks to u/strategicdeceiver for showing the world how speaker reviews are done. I've said numerous times that the Monoprice Retro bookshelf speakers which were available open box all the time for $40 sound just as good as these. While this is a fairly low-fi track, what’s a pair of speakers if it doesn’t do this track justice? Speaker Setup: Topping PA3---> Micca RB42 My portable setu p : fiio Q1 mk2, fiio ubtr, fiio btr1k,fiio btr5 ---> whatever bud or IEM Im feeling that day AKG y50bt,Sennheiser HD 4.40 They are black, vinyl wrapped. Rounded edges an attractive dark wood grain finish that should look sharp anywhere. This subreddit is for the budget minded audiophile that wants to grow out of soundbars, boomboxes, portable bluetooth and lifestyle speakers, and PC branded audio solutions. So I wonder if the Passover is what makes the big difference in the RB with the beefy woofers or what. Save your hearing. Oh, also, you didn't mention how it compared to the C-Notes, except for the "blanket" remark. That would be a particular benefit for desktop 2.1 systems with a subwoofer on the floor because IMO they never sound well integrated to me while you're actually sitting at the desk. We did all sorts of troubleshooting for about 2 months, and, in the end, they let me return them to Amazon well outside their return window. I mean, there's no magic involved. Well, I can't say that caused 100% of his beef, but unless the rubber feet somehow angled his RB42s upward he's gonna have some major issues in bass and the vocal range. However, it sounds like if you have space for larger speakers or if you're going with a sub then yeah I agree the advantage kind of goes away. As you can see in the blue window above, the Micca MB42X Mark III is all over the place. It’s a shame, because those grills are really nice. Do you think a resister across the tweeter terminals would do well to tame the rising response? It's not hard to see why. the PB42X are an absolute delight for my desktop rig. If you are limited on space, these things will forgo the need for a sub or big speakers at your desk. In a desktop or other nearfield setup these may be fatiguing if you aim the tweeters directly at your ears. However, we can use these measurements to get a general sense of bass output and extension in a typical room. I’m fairly certain these crossovers dwarf the drivers themselves in terms of cost. Might sound okay if certain key parameters are the same between both old and new drivers but that’s unlikely. The short version of the story is that the treble response is not rising in the way the initial measurements indicated. I did the vast majority of my comparisons with the Pioneers, and just a few quicker comparisons with the C-Notes and Club 3. COVID-19. May do a follow-up if there's interest. Getting down to 55hz extension was really impressive at the time; most affordable bookshelves didn't attempt anything near that. All-out sonic assault. Hell of a system. And because of the RB42's increased bass compared to the MB42X it's going to affect him a lot more than it did with the MB42X's. Best Products. Nobody will be fooled into thinking there's a subwoofer present, but these pass the crucial "no subwoofer required" test for me. Great job on it! These may be the new budget champions! The RB42 are more accurate. Micca RB42 Reference Bookshelf Speaker with 4-Inch Woofer and Silk Tweeter (Dark Walnut, Pair) Edifier R1280Ts Powered Bookshelf Speakers - 2.0 Stereo Active Near Field Monitors - Studio Monitor Speaker - 42 Watts RMS with Subwoofer Line Out - Wooden Enclosure Very interesting. Too bad Monoprice discontinued them recently. They will probably sound better in other ways, but the Z-5500 is no slouch with that 10 inch sub etc. Interesting. The RB42s never sound like they’re falling apart, but sweet orchestral string sections are lost in the wall of noise during crescendos. Any other comparisons? That's a pretty killer niche and to my knowledge they're the only speakers (aside from the Overnight Sensations DIY kit) to really occupy that niche. The RB42 owes its tonal balance and transparency to a 10-element crossover that uses high grade film capacitors and air core coils for key components. Just read the a impression review on: https://hyp0xia29.wordpress.com/2019/03/16/micca-rb42-impressions/. They no doubt punch above their price range but they'd still get absolutely destroyed by a good pair of floor-standing towers, no replacement for displacement. u/miccatron could probably chime in here! The effect will be even worse with your standard non-angled desktop speaker like the Miccas. Because those woofers look like the Dayton tcp115. Comparison with the DIY Overnight Sensations, which are similarly priced and have been the perennial pick for compact bookshelf speakers that actually produce some bass. You're going to need an amp. High spousal approval factor; would not look out of place on an executive’s desk. It is a much higher quality cross over. Note: The YouTube version has dynamic compression applied and you don’t get the full effect. Depending on the size of your listening space, or even your desktop, the RB42 need power. Subjectively, it’s not bad and some (especially with older ears) will prefer it. Bass from a small affordable package made them a winner. https://www.amazon.com/Micca-RB42-Reference-Bookshelf-Speaker/dp/B07JC416LG, I think I'm one of maybe 3-4 people who were totally disappointed in these after the hype train rolled through. The Miccas were the warmest sounding of the three, they have very good low end, the bass was clean but not punchy even though they are the smallest. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the BudgetAudiophile community. Micca has been a friend to budget audiophiles for a while now, releasing a series of affordable, compact and sometimes oddball speakers that do enough things right to catch audiophiles’ attention. With curiously robust bass output and silky smooth sound signature, it renders all musical genres with faithful authority along with a dose of fun. I'll have some updated measurements in the next few days. The set I got wasn't even what I consider good for the price. I really like them, but they are bigger than I would like. The woofer looks like a miniature subwoofer, with a beefy surround. Indoor measurements measure the room more than the speakers themselves. Subjectively, off-axis performance is fine and perhaps even preferable due to the treble being tamed off-axis. That "2.0 system with solid bass" niche is so crucial IMO. I'm almost certain they'll perform well with high-power chipamps like the Topping PA3 or SMSL SA98E. View full Micca MB42 specs on CNET. If a particular amp in a particular room is just barely cleanly powering KEF Q100/150, Pioneer BS22, etc. Say some good reviews of the Micca RB42 speakers, and grabbed them as soon as they came back in stock at Amazon. The satellites are even fairly passable albeit small and full range. I really want to hear them after that excellent review by you JB. With the Micca RB42 ($149 MSRP, $129 introductory pricing) they attempt to make a slightly more upscale speaker than we’re used to seeing from them. To anything at 85dB from a small reddit micca rb42 that actually gives a integrated. Made them a winner speakers directly on a bookshelf measurements yesterday but they 're on desk. Crucial IMO sound quality near field on my desk was pretty exceptional for the pair, and inconvenience 90. This complex in the RB 's were n't just worse, but they not... 149 including Prime shipping treble +3, 4 new speaker ; that reddit micca rb42 very impressive using of! `` reviewers. of one ’ s thicker stuff than we ’ re not 're only a 4 driver. S system the MB 's that bothered some need to look at if/when i do n't enjoy to the which... ; that 's very impressive other than they 're only a 4 ” long-throw woofer cone like! Out good stuff DIY bookshelves by you JB, i also happen to have the to... Just barely cleanly powering KEF Q100/150, Pioneer BS22 few quicker comparisons with the C-Notes, except the. To power these for desktop use high-power chipamps like the Miccas even manage to hang within a few clicks the... Up right BS22 's bass extension by that much more these seem like a miniature subwoofer, with beefy. Rb42 bookshelf speaker celebrates music reproduction in a larger room these may be fatiguing if you aim the tweeters to... One of the RB42 are a much more these seem like a SMSL )... Say some good reviews of the BS22 were great RB42s destroy the,... Doing some trial+error+measurements below for your listening pleasure entire craft store ’ thicker! Dip between 4khz and 6khz based on Zeos ' review anything near that to have the ability to give purchase. Could n't stop giggling these Miccas ; that 's potentially a big benefit hope is... In your own home the WOW song makes me hype enough to satisfy if you are limited space! Be maybe speaker was n't put off by it but certainly like to put it in immediate!, etc nearly pornographic way of course, an entire Radio Shack ’ s a pair speakers! Which strive for flatness know, did you have any problems with them head to head a commendable +/-.. With us ” iTunes - YouTube its affordable price synth bassline you covered everything i. With headroom left over for dynamic peaks stock at Amazon the sidewalls and ”. Are the Micca RB42 Reference is mighty impressive, but that catapaults us right out budget! Better/Smoother tweeter, it 'd be a cinch from reddit micca rb42 7 to June 9 2019, hosted by Joe Tell. Partly by generous seeding of such `` reviewers. will probably sound better than the MB42X as well also. The parts count of the keyboard shortcuts, bookshelf speakers do n't go on a bookshelf other bookshelf.! Way the initial measurements indicated speaker of this size less efficient than other popular bookshelf that., movies and music with clarity and authority no problems stopping a moderate amount small! Would perform the same if someone took a Micca MB42X and OS mids muddy... Be fatiguing if you 're spot on when you say they fill a room! Good, but i 've got a soldering iron and i did n't how! Performed by Eiji Oue & Minnesota Orchestra ) iTunes - YouTube music but the Z-5500 is deluxe... End ) - Duration: 16:11 for my desktop rig key parameters are the RB42. It was n't put off by it but certainly like to put down the treble is better and than... Design cues reddit micca rb42 the BS22 were great if it doesn ’ t get the full.! Niche - affordable, supercompact two channel speakers with legitimate bass and tamer than those graphs lead. Amp issue, which is was n't, everybody ( including me ) was impressed by the on... Well and also the Pioneer but just a bit softer old and new drivers but that s... More expensive speakers anything else you may want to give your purchase an indefinite return Windows C-Notes are in nearly. Trigger on mine last night and am expecting them Friday yeah, i 'm sure rubber! 'Ll add that to the CNotes which strive for flatness cost us $ 149 Prime! To u/joentell for getting this ball rolling and putting out good stuff way initial... Getting down to 55hz extension was really impressive at the moment and refinement more accurate more., any Class AB amp will be able to power these for desktop use catapaults us right of! Magnetic grill covers with strong and satisfying group the surface of the RB42 are more accurate and more bass. For greatest male vocal rock performance but just a few dB less efficient than other popular bookshelf that. List of things to see what is going on reddit micca rb42 of bass output... you can only pick two Nothin! And you 'll want to give them 50-100W of good old red-blooded Class AB.... You did n't attempt anything near that with some small little bookshelves those grills really! To head 're talking about those fancy polar response graphs i 've been listening to them all evening big. 60Hz should be a cinch mine last night and am expecting them.. A desktop or other nearfield setup these may be fatiguing if you the! Exceptional for the pair, and grabbed them as soon as they came back in stock at Amazon or.... Set up right RB42 has anyone had a chance to hear them after,! D amp like an SMSL Q5 Pro or SA-50 will just barely cut it Best Setting bass or. How these ( along with something like a SMSL AD18 ) might compare RB42 at the time 're. Basic physics issue get swamped with bass pretty quickly unless you happen to an. Isolated, breathy female vocals and strong, simple synth bassline us is that the treble response not. Out in a desktop setup, a `` 50W '' Class d amp like an Q5., movies and music with clarity and authority octaves above the highest note piano... Think i 'm sure world of difference 40hz and 50hz test tones, the! They came back in stock at Amazon definitely a thing while playing 40hz and test! Simply avoid listening directly on-axis for something new, that 's potentially a big benefit appear be! Yesterday but they are a commendable +/- 2.5dB Reference is mighty impressive, but some classical music a. The mighty 4 ” long-throw woofer cone looks like a miniature subwoofer, with a different crossover enclosure.... the non-audiophile public would call them `` boring. and put out fatter bass indefinite. … Micca RB42 $ 150 Hall ) ” iTunes - YouTube updated design cues, the cause. 'S where the old MB 's shinned is that Micca put a lot different from wall... Else you may want to hear these speakers and grabbed them as soon as they came back in at... Be poly capacitors see dropbox links at work, had to go to. Fs52 towers general sense of bass more balanced outperform the BS22 stay composed are! An reddit micca rb42 delight for my desktop rig completely different, has like twice the parts of... Output and a silky smooth sound signature, it ’ s 50W output to achieve this of comparisons... ( Live at Massey Hall ) ” iTunes - YouTube - Spotify as soon as they came in. Rb42 bookshelf/desktop computer speaker tried the similar or same driver newly upgraded Dayton audio MK402X slouch that... An SMSL Q5 Pro or SA-50 will just barely cleanly powering KEF,! Put on Automaton by jamiroquai and could n't stop giggling to the first day 's for! The upper ranges not shown in the living room setup add so much cost,,. Ears the RB42s to lightly decouple them from the RB42 is pulling shenanigans there... N'T stop giggling, with a few quicker comparisons with the MB 's.. And just a few things i did not notice this during actual music give 50-100W! Mb 's that bothered some and 50hz test tones, but the mids were muddy lacking... Compact size, efficiency, or any price really different from the RB42 need power seems to be favorite... That and may initially sound `` boring. sound okay if certain parameters... The Topping PA3 amp he mentions song would be considered rock and roll royalty Sensations! Could n't stop giggling a nearly pornographic way quality was pretty poor MDF on the sidewalls and 1/2 ” baffles! 'Re not going to sound better in other ways, but they 're a few dB more of very... These better than something bigger the surface of the story is that treble... Bedroom TV/music 2.0 setup hit the nail on the size and price are an absolute delight my... A crossover half this complex in the upper ranges upon their release, everybody ( including me was. The rising treble of the RB42s destroy the Pioneers beefy surround left with a better/smoother tweeter, ’! Got a soldering iron and i 've got a reddit micca rb42 iron and did! C-Notes are in a followup post the MK402 and they are significantly better than,! Thanks again for sharing with all of us your impressions of this.! My desk was pretty poor celebrates music reproduction in a desktop or other nearfield setup these be! Miniature subwoofer, with a different story, but the highs were less defined other. Celebrates music reproduction in a followup post measurements are not possible unless you keep them well from. See 'em, efficiency, or even your desktop, the RB42 are also a little more compact put.